Reported by Afilawos Magana Sur, investigative Journalist at Sele Media Africa.
Former Kaduna State governor, Nasir El-Rufai, appeared in court on Wednesday to face a three-count charge stemming from allegations that he falsely claimed the phone communications of Nigeria’s National Security Adviser, Nuhu Ribadu, were unlawfully intercepted. The case marks a significant development in an unfolding dispute involving two prominent figures in Nigeria’s political and security architecture. Prosecutors allege that El-Rufai made public statements suggesting that the communications of the National Security Adviser had been illegally tapped, an assertion authorities contend is unfounded and potentially injurious to national security interests.While full details of the charges were not immediately disclosed at the time of filing this report, the three-count charge is understood to relate to allegations of false publication and the potential dissemination of claims capable of undermining public confidence in national security institutions. Background to the dispute the controversy reportedly began after comments attributed to El-Rufai circulated in political and media circles, alleging that security apparatus linked to the federal government had intercepted Ribadu’s communications. The claims triggered public debate over surveillance practices, executive power, and the integrity of Nigeria’s security framework. Ribadu, a former anti-corruption chief and current National Security Adviser, occupies a critical role in coordinating Nigeria’s counterterrorism and national security strategy. Any suggestion of unlawful interception of his communications carries weighty institutional implications. Legal analysts note that cases involving allegations of false statements against public officials often hinge on evidentiary thresholds, intent, and whether the statements constitute criminal defamation, misinformation, or violations under Nigeria’s cybercrime and security statutes.Legal and Political ImplicationsEl-Rufai, a former minister of the Federal Capital Territory and two-term governor of Kaduna State, remains an influential political figure within Nigeria’s ruling establishment. His court appearance underscores growing scrutiny of public commentary by political actors, particularly when it intersects with national security matters. Observers say the case could test the boundaries between freedom of expression and statutory protections surrounding security information. It may also influence the broader political dynamics within the governing elite, given the stature of both individuals involved.As proceedings continue, the court is expected to examine the veracity of the alleged statements, the context in which they were made, and whether they meet the threshold for criminal liability under Nigerian law. Sele Media Africa will continue to monitor developments and provide updates as more details emerge from the courtroom. Sources: Premium Times Nigeria; The Punch; Channels Television; Vanguard Nigeria.
Afilawos Magana Sur is a journalist from Bogoro Local Government Area of Bauchi State, currently based in Bauchi metropolis. He is known for his commitment to accurate, ethical, and responsible journalism, with a focus on reporting issues of public relevance and community development.
About The Author
Share this:
Discover more from Sele Media Africa
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
